Friday, May 18, 2012

A Look at "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins

Caution: This book is not for the spiritually wavering. If your belief cannot withstand a full-on assault—stay away from it!*

Richard Dawkins’ book, The God Delusion, spent many, many weeks in the top ten on the New York Times Best Sellers list and it sits at number 33 as I post this. It is unapologetically anti-religion, anti-Christian and anti-God.

Dawkins calls the God of the Old Testament a “sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully,” among other things, none of them nice. Dawkins carefully, thoroughly, argues against all the reasons people believe there is—or even might be—a God. He encourages atheists who are worried about how others might perceive them if they knew they were atheists to “come out” and be proud in precisely the same manner as gays have done. He heartily recommends that those who are unhappy with their religion abandon it without remorse.

He envisions a better, more moral, more rational, more sane future—a world where your God and all other gods are little more than moral fairy tales from a backward time. To “cool up” this notion he (not surprisingly) invokes the John Lennon daydream: “Imagine there’s no religion.”

You may say Dawkins is a dreamer, but he’s not the only one. I had to say that but it happens to be true. If you haven’t heard, there’s an atheist “movement” going on out there, championed by guys like Dawkins, Sam Harris and Steven Weinberg. There are books, interviews and lectures. On Dawkins’ website there is even a flyer that can be printed (ideal for handing out to “spread the word”) promoting The God Delusion. The flyer says “Imagine No Religion” on it against the backdrop of a pre-911 New York skyline, twin towers prominently featured. These guys are motivated, they are serious and they want to erase religion from the face of the Earth.

You may think that, as a Christian, I am going to attack Dawkins and condemn his book. You would be wrong on both counts.

His book is well-written, smart, poignant, funny in places and cleverly persuasive (again, not for the young or immature believer, I would warn). This is a man unequivocally dedicated to what he believes. He’s convinced he has hold of crucial truths that can change individual lives, and all human life, for the better. He wants to share these precious truths with the whole world.

Sound familiar? It should. If you’ve ever met (or been) someone “on fire for the Lord” this would be an apt description of such a person. Richard Dawkins is a fire-breathing missionary for secular materialism and rationalism. He is the Billy Graham of atheists.

Dawkins reminds us of the evil done in God’s name: the Crusades, the Inquisition, Catholic vs. Protestant violence in the UK, 9-11. He calls our attention to the divisive, exclusivist nature of religion, and the kinds of harsh, ugly bigotry that can be bred in certain religious environments.

If we deny these things, well, then we’re not interested in the truth.

Still, most of we everyday, ordinary Christians don’t see the ultra-scary side of religion that Dawkins so fears. We were not molested by church officials or beaten into submission by mean-spirited parents. We were not encouraged to murder those who oppose our beliefs or told to hate homosexuals. We do not act morally primarily out of fear of punishment or desire for reward; but rather because we delight in serving our Heavenly Father just as a mature child might care for his parents out of love rather than duty. We were been born and raised in the midst of a kind, gentle community of people that prayed for us when we were sick and performed tangible acts of kindness to help us when we were otherwise in trouble.

So this sick, dark world of aberrant demagoguery that Dawkins abhors is a foreign entity to us.

The God Delusion is a book about philosophy and prophecy. Dawkins’ philosophy is that God is a delusion and his prophecy is that a world without God or gods will be a less violent, more humane place.

Two problems right away. Most of the world disagrees with him on the first point and there is no data to establish the truth of his second point. Where is the model of an intentionally irreligious society that deliberately raises its children to be atheists? We don’t have one. Will the absence of religion truly birth future generations of intrinsically more moral human beings? This is not something we know as a fact.

The most serious problem, however, with the philosophy of The God Delusion is that Dawkins’ vision is incredibly unlikely to be universally adapted any time soon. Why? Because his rationalistic, non-belief paradigm will not seize the hearts of the vast majority of human beings.

Most of us live in a world where we labor every day (in a field, a warehouse, or an office) to care for ourselves and our family. We work, play, live and die more in need of the hope faith and prayer bring us than the whimsical, poetic possibilities of quantum physics. Our lives contain dark corners of fear, insecurity, ambiguity and sometimes overwhelming emptiness. We’re more likely to draw comfort from a sacred book than from beholding the wonder of cell division.

Some outspoken atheists understand this and willingly distance themselves from Dawkins’ preaching. Anthropologist and author Scott Atran is one of these.

Atran says, “Science is not particularly well-suited to deal with problems of human existence that have no enduring logical and or factual solution, such as…anticipating catastrophes, overcoming loneliness, finding love or ensuring justice.” Web Page Referenced

In an atheistic worldview we must believe that the infinitely dense cosmic zygote—the primal invisible seed that contained everything that ultimately unfolded to result in conscious, intelligent, sentient, reasoning, longing, hyper-complex beings like you and I—was uncaused. It just was: sitting out there in oblivion, waiting to become the universe and all biological life. Waiting to become you and I. We must believe that unguided, purposeless forces—mindless matter—conspired to incrementally build the human mind solely through the blind mechanism of natural selection.

Why? How? Why is there something rather than nothing? There is no scientific answer for those questions. Even Dawkins admits this much.

Atheism is a belief system suitable for only a small portion of Earthlings. When Dawkins’ waxes rhapsodic about the marvels of the natural world—a thing which he does often and with great eloquence in another book he authored, Unweaving the Rainbow—he is scratching the surface of his own itch to believe in a higher power even as he vehemently denies there is one. There are many lovely passages in this book regarding the glories of the universe that, as a believer, I found edifying and inspirational. They were much like prayers, atheistic psalms, if you will.

The inhabitants of the modern world owe a great deal to smart men like Richard Dawkins and their predecessors who have taken the simple act of observation and turned it into a fantastic library of critical knowledge. But very few people live in this world of grand discovery. Few will ever peer into an electron microscope or make a study of dark matter.

The God Delusion, then, is an excellent book with conclusions that only a small minority, I predict, will ever fully embrace; yet it is a book that any thinking person could learn a lot from.

Once more–if your faith is not rock-solid you may want to avoid this one. If it is you might find it irksome at times yet quite entertaining and enlightening at other times.

I’m giving it three-and-a-half (out of five) Darwin Heads.

The simple answer to Dawkins is that God is right and every man a liar. The Biblical answer is clear: where was Dawkins, after all, when God was laying the foundations of the Earth? For the ones with unshakable faith it is enough to say, “The Bible says it, I believe it, and that settles it.”
Not all believers are at this place. So they need a little “human” argument.

I’ve offered mine.

*If you’re interested in a detailed, intelligent, counter-argument (far deeper and more academic than I am capable of) here’s a great article from Christianity Today: Christianity Today Article

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

A Look at "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins written by: · July 11, 2007
's website:

Comments

No Responses to “A Look at "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins”
  1. Wonderment says:

    >>The most serious problem, however, with the philosophy of The God Delusion is that Dawkins’ vision is incredibly unlikely to be universally adapted any time soon. Why? Because his rationalistic, non-belief paradigm will not seize the hearts of the vast majority of human beings.>>

    Speaking of a new paradigm, have a look at Midbar’s Atheist’s Prayer: http://www.atheistprayer.blogspot.com

  2. jim says:

    I’m assuming this is your take on life. Correct me if I’m wrong.

    Your paradigm appears really interesting. A way to have “religiosity” in your life while still not believing in God? I sympathize with your plight: it’s like longing for a Twinkie but being afraid that the sugar will poison your system.

    Fortunately for you, God is calorie-free and you have no need to be afraid. I can never prove God to you, my friend, not even if given the intellect of Einstein, the compassion of Mother Theresa, and the evangelism skills of Billy Graham.

    God can prove himself to you, though.

    You’re halfway to belief, already; you acknowledge the emptiness within when the sacred and divine things are absent from human life. Take it a step farther. See that this emptiness is not an accident of evolution but the imprint of the Creator upon your soul.

    Pray that God will reveal himself to you. I just did.

    Best to you,

    Jim W

  3. A few comments from an atheist :evil:

    First of all, nice post!
    I sensed that in the beginning you suggested that Dawkins is another one of those dangerous fundamentalists. I will agree with you that Dawkins is one of the more outspoken atheists, not afraid to speak his mind, however, the “you are a radical attack” is so common that Dawkins meets this claim in his book as well as in an interview which I have cited on my blog…

    “It would be intolerant if I advocated the banning of religion, but of course I never have. I merely give robust expression to views about the cosmos and morality with which you happen to disagree. You interpret that as ‘intolerance’ because of the weirdly privileged status of religion, which expects to get a free ride and not have to defend itself. If I wrote a book called The Socialist Delusion or The Monetarist Delusion, you would never use a word like intolerance. But The God Delusion sounds automatically intolerant. Why? What’s the difference?

    I have a (you might say fanatical) desire for people to use their own minds and make their own choices, based upon publicly available evidence. Religious fanatics want people to switch off their own minds, ignore the evidence, and blindly follow a holy book based upon private ‘revelation’. There is a huge difference.”

    There is no clear atheist society. However, there are many secular societies and in my opinion they work a lot better than non-secular societies. In my own country, Sweden, 79% say that they do not believe in the biblical God. Perhaps incidentally, Sweden is also one of the safest countries in the world (I don’t think religion plays a major role in this correlation though).

    Is God a delusion? You say that most people don’t think so and you may be right, but that does not mean he is not a delusion. A french minister recently said that she thought it was possible that the US government were behind 9/11. Why? Because so many people visit the web sites that write about the conspiracies… Not a valid argument…

  4. jim says:

    I’m not going to argue you into belief–nor will you argue me into non-belief. How we have arrived where we are is too complicated and nuanced for that.

    Majority opinion has never been a measure of truth. This is as true in science as it is in any other realm of human thought. Very often, it took a lot of convincing by a minority of scientists to get the rest to abandon their old hypotheses.

    What the scientific community believes today about the nature of the universe is quite different from what it believed 50 years ago, and it will be different again in 50 years.

    For some, the more they understand about the natural world the more they are convinced of God; for others, the opposite is true.

    It is human nature to want to be right, but God’s existence or non-existence is not dependent upon how smart we are or how persuaded we are. God is or is not a reality–regardless of our belief.

    Lots of brilliant people (physicists, biologists and, yes, both rocket scientists and brain surgeons) believe in God. Lots of brilliant people don’t.

    So there we are. Stalemate.

    You have your faith in accidents and atoms generating the universe and all life, and I have God. We can still respect one another. You can pity me for my irrational need to believe, while I pray for your eyes and heart to be opened to a beautiful and liberating way to live and face eternity.

    Peace,

    Jim

  5. The Zoner says:

    Great stuff. I just found this site and love your posts.

    Cheers,
    The Zoner

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!